Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Calvin Hemery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kecmanovic vs Hemery analysis and find out who is favored!
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Calvin Hemery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kecmanovic 1 - 0 Hemery
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kecmanovic has won 54.08% of points on his second serve, while Hemery has won 50.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kecmanovic, in recent form, has won 51.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hemery has won 46.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.9% and 31.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kecmanovic has saved 55.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hemery has saved 60.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kecmanovic has won 44.83% of matches played (W/L 26/ 32), with Hemery winning 60% (W/L 45/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kecmanovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 118/ 74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15). Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 184/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Kecmanovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18), where as Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 34/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kecmanovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 2 and Hemery winning 0. The last match between Kecmanovic and Hemery was at the Suzhou Challenger, 24-10-2017, First, Hard with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kecmanovic and Hemery have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kecmanovic winning 0 times and Hemery 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kecmanovic winning 0, and Hemery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kecmanovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 148.5 while Hemery has played against players with an average rank of 270.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kecmanovic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hemery has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kecmanovic has converted 36.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hemery has converted 36.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kecmanovic 1 - 0 Hemery
58
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
205
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
58% (279-205)
Career Total W/L
58% (362-258)
46% (12-14)
YTD W/L
43% (12-16)
$3,767,650
Career Prize Money
$181,475
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kecmanovic VS Hemery H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Miomir Kecmanovic | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:43 | 0:57:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (23/41) | 62% (32/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (18/23) | 53% (17/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (29/52) | 29% (12/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kecmanovic VS Hemery H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Calvin Hemery
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Miomir Kecmanovic | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (12/14) | 43% (12/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (31/37) | 45% (29/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (326/343) | 49% (306/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 52% (11/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.56 |
| Aces Total | 113 | 170 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:14 | 1:50:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 143.69 | 274.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1301/2049) | 62% (1223/1969) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (886/1301) | 70% (855/1223) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (397/748) | 51% (380/746) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (70/187) | 37% (62/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (782/2133) | 37% (738/1997) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 48% (11/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 42% (11/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 21% (3/14) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 7% (14/1) |
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Casper Ruud
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
David Goffin
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Matteo Berrettini
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Calvin Hemery
61%
(
76 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
10
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kecmanovic Vs Hemery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
